Investigating Construction Activity, Using Network Analysis Like the Critical Path Method (CMP)

Authors

  • Department of Statistics, Faculty of Natural and Applied Sciences, Nasarawa State University Keffi
  • Department of Statistics, Faculty of Natural and Applied Sciences, Nasarawa State University Keffi
  • Department of Statistics, Faculty of Natural and Applied Sciences, Yobe State University Damaturu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56595/lbr.v1i1.3

Keywords:

Predecessor activity, Successor activity, Float, Critical path, Project, Activity

Abstract

Managing construction work is the process of breaking down the structures of the construction, determining the relationship between each activity to be carried out, the duration that is needed for every activity, and the creation of a schedule that is flexible. Problems might crop up in most constructions such as an increase in the cost of the project, the project not being finished at the stipulated time (schedule slippage), limitation of resources, and so on. The aim of this study is to investigate a network construction at Keffi new market, using the critical path method, this study will investigate the time of completion of a project and estimate the earliest and shortest time needed to complete the project, identifying the critical and non-critical task activity, data collection from project supervisor at Canonic Consult Ltd. Considering activities such as identification of all the activities necessary for the project construction, precedence relationship within the stated task, development of the network diagram, estimation of the earliest start time (EST) and latest start time (LST), determining the task that is critical and non-critical to timely completion of the project (float task). The outcome of the study shows that the expected completion time for the project is approximately 10 weeks, exactly 67 days and the critical activities are Foundation, Electrical & Plumbing, Floor, and Landscaping. The Noncritical activities are Site Clearance, Setting-out, Columns, Framework, Brick masonry, Roof structure, Plastering, Door & window fixation, Painting, and Electrical fittings and their “total float” is 19,17, 18, 28, 19, 17, 32, 28, 32, 28 and 22 days respectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adibhesami, M. A., Ekhlassi, A., Mosadeghrad, A. M., & Mohebifar, A. (2019). Improving time-cost balance in critical path method (CPM) using Dragonfly Algorithm (DA). International Journal of Industrial Engineering & Production Research, 30(2), 187-194.

Andiyan, A., Putra, R. M., Rembulan, G. D., & Tannady, H. (2021, June). Construction project evaluation using CPM-Crashing, CPM-PERT, and CCPM for minimize project delays. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1933, No. 1, p. 012096). IOP Publishing.

Dorfeshan, Y., Mousavi, S. M., Mohagheghi, V., & Vahdani, B. (2018). Selecting project-critical path by a new interval type-2 fuzzy decision methodology based on MULTIMOORA, MOOSRA and TPOP methods. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 120, 160-178.

Hegazy, T., &Ersahin, T. (2001). Simplified spreadsheet solutions. II: Overall schedule optimization. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 127(6), 469-475.

Kusumadarma, I. A., Pratami, D., Yasa, I. P., & Tripiawan, W. (2020). Developing project schedule in telecommunication projects using critical path method (CPM). International Journal of Integrated Engineering, 12(3), 60-67.

Koo, B., Fischer, M., & Kunz, J. (2007). Formalization of construction sequencing rationale and classification mechanism to support rapid generation of sequencing alternatives. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 21(6), 423-433.

Lalmi, A., Fernandes, G., & Souad, S. B. (2021). A conceptual hybrid project management model for construction projects. Procedia Computer Science, 181, 921-930.

Lucky, F., & Linda, M. R. (2022). Project scheduling analysis using critical path method and program evaluation review technique. Operations Management and Information System Studies, 2(1), 14-25.

Mahamid, I., Bruland, A., &Dmaidi, N. (2012). Causes of Delay in Road Construction Projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 28(3), 300–310.

Marnewick, C., &Marnewick, A. L. (2019). The demands of industry 4.0 on project teams. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 67(3), 941-949.

Masango, J. F. (2015). Critical Path Method as a Project Modelling Technique in Coal Refurbishment Projects. University of Johannesburg (South Africa).

Mohamed, A., & Celik, T. (2002). Knowledge based-system for alternative design, cost estimating and scheduling. Knowledge-Based Systems, 15(3), 177-188.

Park, Y.-I., & Papadopoulou, T. C. (2012). Causes of cost overruns in transport infrastructure projects in Asia: Their significance and relationship with project size. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 2(2), 195–216.

Ramani, P. V., Selvaraj, P., Shanmugapriya, T., & Gupta, A. (2022). Application of Linear Scheduling in Water Canal Construction with a Comparison of Critical Path Method. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 27(1), 189-212.

Salhab, D., Møller, D. E., Lindhard, S. M., Hamzeh, F., Randrup, M., & Pilgaard, A. (2022). Accounting for Variability: Identifying Critical Activities as a Supplement to the Critical Path. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(5), 04022019.

Santoso, D. S., & Soeng, S. (2016). Analyzing delays of road construction projects in Cambodia: Causes and effects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 32(6), 05016020.

Syahputri, K., Mukhlidani, P., Sari, R. M., & Rizkya, I. (2020, May). Optimization of Sei Wampu Dam Project Schedule Using Critical Path Method. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 851, No. 1, p. 012054). IOP Publishing.

Yogeswaran, K., Kumaraswamy, M. M., & Miller, D. R. (1998). Claims for extensions of time in civil engineering projects. Construction Management & Economics, 16(3), 283-293.

Zareei, S. (2018). Project scheduling for constructing biogas plant using critical path method. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 756-759.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-18

How to Cite

Muhammad Sadis Isa, Bilkisu Maijamaa, & Babagana Modu. (2022). Investigating Construction Activity, Using Network Analysis Like the Critical Path Method (CMP). Lloyd Business Review, 1(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.56595/lbr.v1i1.3

Issue

Section

Research Articles